Coup On Public Attitude – Its Influence On Society – 3 [World Family – Vasudhika Kutumbam]

Now, I hope that you can identify the conditions of the world and the relation of its cause and effect.

If we refer the above example of family, who have to control the strong and early fellows to leave food for weak and late comers? The religious believes perform such duty of control on society. The belief of the existence of God, his ability of watching every body’s activities either good or bad, the existence of heaven and hell could control the society to proceed in faithful and peaceful way.

Indians feel that their country is like their family. That’s why they used to describe a good king as “So and so king had ruled his people as if they were his children”, or “So and so king had taken care of his people like a father”. Indians used to call the good kings as “Ramayya Thandri” which means “Rama our father”. That’s why only Indians could call Gandhiji as ‘Bapuji’ and Indira Gandhi as ‘Indiramma’. That’s why only Indian calls their co-citizens as brother and sisters.

In India, except Hyderabad Nizam and Aurangzeb of Delhi Muslim kings no other king had harassed people. There was no ‘magna carta’ on Indian kings by people. There was no ‘Gelatin use’ on any race of kings in India. There was no need of ‘Congress of Vienna’ to any king in India to cheat public.

Because, Indians could think all the co-citizens are like a family members. That’s why Indians only could imagine ‘Vasudhika Kutumbam’, which means “The world as one family”. Such faithfulness and loving nature is the ancestral asset of Indians.

That’s why only in Indian history, and in Hindu Mythology, Rama who ever sacrificed his kingdom, became God. He did not kill his brothers and father like Aurangzeb in case of Shajahan in Indian history. Gauthama Buddha, who ever left his kingdom to think to eliminate the sorrows from human life became God. The king Asoka, who killed his brothers, could place in the equivalent position with Aurangzeb if he didn’t merge as Dharma Ashok from Chanda Asoka.

This is the Indian Blood.

This is the Human Blood.

So many kings had ruled this land in previous. Did public remember them? One Bhoja, one Samudra Gupta, one Sri Krishna Devaraya, one Akbar like that, very few are remembered by public. I’m not saying about the record in history. I’m saying, only about the record in public mind. There are so many musicians, now and in past. Only Tyagayya, Annamayya, Tukaram like that very few are in public memory. Who ever lived without selfishness, with sacrifice, with kind to public are still living in public hearts though their physical body died centuries back.

There is nothing wrong, if a person lives for himself. But there is a divine touch, if a person lives for others. In such a way, a common man can become as Mahatma. Bapuji i.e. Matma Gandhi is live example for this.

In now-a-days, like match fixings, there are possibilities to get fame as social servants and poor serving people. The media can give such fame and relevant awards to popular the persons who have the desire of limelight. Regarding my complaint against Mr. Ramoji Rao, Enadu, when I met another media man Mr. Sai Baba who is working in competitive paper to Enadu i.e. Vaartha, he explained me with high patience about this system of getting popularity. The full particulars of this issue I explained under the caption of ‘RAMOJI RAO’S WRITINGS AND ACTIVITIES BEFORE 1992 AND AFTER 1992’.


But one thing we have to notice here. The popularity, the fame, the image through media or something else like that, also temporary. There is no difference between material and popularity. If we do any work with the desire to get popularity is equivalent to the work, doing with the desire to get money or wealth. Doing good for the sake of good is divine activity. Such good souls only can live on this earth even after their death. This is because; the time has the ability of proving the truth. The strategy of BLACK GOAT – FOUR THIEVES cannot super emboss or mesmerize the people for long time. Such fame fixing has temporary effect.

In fact, we believe that whatever we do either good or evil, whether people notice it or not, but God will notice it. Whatever we do, we should feel comfortable with our selves. If we are not comfortable with others, we move apart from them. We prevent their involvement in our life. In such case if we are not comfortable with our selves, how can we prevent ourselves?

Here I refer a story from Sri Rama Krishna Paramahamsa Bhodhamrutham i.e. preaches.

One day, a saint was going beside a village tank. Some mischievous children had driven an animal i.e. cow or buffalo into a mud dig and harassing it. The animal was suffering from their violence; the naughty children were enjoying it. Some villagers were watching it. But nobody could prevent the children beware of their violent nature. By watching all of that, the saint could not keep calm. He tried to prevent the children, from throwing stones towards the animal. He effort to pull out the animal from mud dig and driven it from that place. While doing such, he fallen on the ground, in the mud, but he could save the animal. The villagers laughed at him.

While he was washing his body in the village tank, some of the villagers asked him, why he took such an effort to save the animal by taking risk of striking of stones. He replied those “My little fathers! I didn’t save the animal for the sake of you, or for the sake of children or for the sake of good and evil. I saved it for the sake of myself. By watching such violence on the other living being, I was not comfortable. To make myself comfortable, to make my mind peaceful, I done such. That’s all!”

Here Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa preached us that ‘every human being has his own ‘Antherwani’ i.e. inner voice. If we hear to it, we will be peaceful and comfortable with us. If we nullify it, the impeacefulness encroaches on us and drives us from ourselves.’

If we have good communication with ourselves that means if we hear and follow our inner voice: God will see us and we can see God. To support this Bhagavad Geetha preach us that our mind itself is our friend as well our enemy.

The believes what I mentioned above, all are influenced public. Because of that, only I could read them on books and anybody could read them. Because such thoughts and attitude was influenced public, that’s why only they were recorded in books. This is the faithful side i.e. head of the coin. The tail of coin is evil thoughts i.e. thoughts of violence, sex, easy money making and thought of enjoying the fruit without harvesting it. This thought is nothing but robbery. Unfortunately, such thought of robbery and ability of robbering got such a positive caption as successes or victory. Such robbers got the image of rich or fame.

Actually, in each and every person, some good and some bad are there. In this nature, in which manner they day and night or day are there, in such manner, every living being has something good and advantage nature and something bad and disadvantage nature. If a person has more good qualities, than the evil qualities, he is known as good man. If a person has more bad qualities, than the good qualities, he is known as bad man.


In fact, in Indian society, there was a system to highlight the good qualities
through all the art forms, music, literature and idioms, and all other propaganda channels. The elders lead the youth in such faithful way, as “Yadha Raja, Thadha Praja i.e. How the leaders and kings are, the people will be like that only.”

Such that in Indian Tradition, there was a network to create work-joy culture. People used to enjoy in work. The target shown to public was performing their work by leaving the result to God. By the way, they could enjoy the work without the tension of result. The reverse order of this, is enjoying the fruit i.e. result without working. This is happening now. Corruptive methods, rank fixings, match fixings, purchasing of jobs and all methods of immorality is nothing but enjoying the fruit without working i.e. thiefting the result. I’m not saying that all the past was good. There were also good & evil. But majority proportion was good.

People were encouraged to speak truth. The truth telling personalities were worshipped as Gods, like Sri Rama. The life histories of men who practiced truth telling were treated as epics like Satya Haritschandra. The question of Sri Rama’s existence and Satya Haritschandra’s existence is meaningless. Whether some man, Sri Rama could live on this earth, or not, whether some man, Harris Chandra could live really in this earth, or not, whether such epic leaders are really lived persons or imaginary roles by poets, but the values what they practiced are real values. Such values and such Characters could motivate the people to practice the same values. Mahatma Gandhi is live example for it. How much inspiration he got from the story of Satya Haritschandra, we know, everybody knows.

In such case, why not the debates on the existence of roles in epics, is the mislead and misguide of public from the practice of prescribed values in epics by the coup makers i.e. CIA, ISI, Ramoji Rao and their supporters?


That’s why only in past, hundreds of poets & poets had written Ramayana, Maha Bharatha, Bhagavathans in different Indian languages. No one like Ranga Nayakamma had written Ramayana Vishavruksham.